I have to say that I am tempted to flaunt my “I told you so” banner at the moment. At one of APSCUF’s Legislative Assembly meetings last year, I made a case both on the floor of the Assembly and privately with some of our union’s leadership that we were going to get hammered if we rejected the retirement incentive package. Pithy acronym’s (R.I.P.) notwithstanding, the argument from the State’s side was plain as day from my vantage point. And, sure enough, in today’s Patriot-News we see a version of what I said on the Assembly floor. Here’s a peek:
Contributing to the system’s financial challenges are anticipated pension and health benefits cost increases and the loss of $38.2 million in federal stimulus money the system is receiving this year.
The savings achieved from the retirement incentive would have been significantly more had the system’s faculty and coaches union agreed to participate in the program.
The union, which represents about 7,000 employees, opted not to agree to it after the system rejected its offer to link the incentive with a two-year contract extension that included pay raises.
Can you see where this is going? Let’s try: “maybe there would have been no retrenchment if APSCUF would have agreed to the retirement incentive;” or, “maybe tuition would not have had to gone up so much if APSCUF would have agreed to the retirement incentive;” or “maybe _______ if APSCUF would have agreed to the retirement incentive.” Blame the faculty for the budget crisis. That’s always PASSHE’s game plan. And here we are–regardless of some of the reasons why APSCUF thought it was a bad idea.
I do have to say, however, that APSCUF President Hicks did a decent job of not simply digging in his heels and defending the union’s decision. He opened up the possibility for returning to the retirement incentive program as part of negotiations:
given the large savings that a faculty retirement incentive could produce to help with next year’s revenue shortfall, Hicks said he wouldn’t be surprised if it resurfaced in the upcoming round of contract talks.
We’ll see. Here’s a link to the full article:
Retirement incentives to save universities millions – PennLive.com.